<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Virginia Gains Momentum and Double Threat</title>
	<atom:link href="http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/virginia-gains-momentum-and-double-threat/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/virginia-gains-momentum-and-double-threat/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:40:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Affiliate Marketing Fanatics 20: Fly, Fat A**, Fly (But not on Southwest)</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/virginia-gains-momentum-and-double-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-324</link>
		<dc:creator>Affiliate Marketing Fanatics 20: Fly, Fat A**, Fly (But not on Southwest)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 03:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=709#comment-324</guid>
		<description>[...] AA: Virginia Gains Momentum and Double Threat [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] AA: Virginia Gains Momentum and Double Threat [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: uberVU - social comments</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/virginia-gains-momentum-and-double-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-316</link>
		<dc:creator>uberVU - social comments</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 10:55:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=709#comment-316</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Social comments and analytics for this post...&lt;/strong&gt;

This post was mentioned on Twitter by AffAdvocacy: Virginia Internet sales tax Finance approves - moves to full Senate http://tinyurl.com/ygwtxqh &amp; double threat- a Second Bill exists...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Social comments and analytics for this post&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>This post was mentioned on Twitter by AffAdvocacy: Virginia Internet sales tax Finance approves &#8211; moves to full Senate <a href="http://tinyurl.com/ygwtxqh" rel="nofollow">http://tinyurl.com/ygwtxqh</a> &amp; double threat- a Second Bill exists&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Donny</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/virginia-gains-momentum-and-double-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-314</link>
		<dc:creator>Donny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Feb 2010 02:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=709#comment-314</guid>
		<description>Yeah it might make the *state* more prosperous but....it may also make the internet marketer (the one bringing the business in in the first place) less prosperous. What I mean by that is; if companies (Amazon for example) decide that it is more *prosperous* (or less costly) not to do business in that state then the consumer and the marketer both loose. Personally I think these states that are considering (or actually already are) imposing these &#039;taxes&#039; are shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. These same states give millions each year in tax breaks (and bailouts) to bring what they consider big business in...at several billion dollars a year world wide, isn&#039;t internet marketing &quot;big business&quot;???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah it might make the *state* more prosperous but&#8230;.it may also make the internet marketer (the one bringing the business in in the first place) less prosperous. What I mean by that is; if companies (Amazon for example) decide that it is more *prosperous* (or less costly) not to do business in that state then the consumer and the marketer both loose. Personally I think these states that are considering (or actually already are) imposing these &#8216;taxes&#8217; are shooting themselves in the proverbial foot. These same states give millions each year in tax breaks (and bailouts) to bring what they consider big business in&#8230;at several billion dollars a year world wide, isn&#8217;t internet marketing &#8220;big business&#8221;???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virginia Resident</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/virginia-gains-momentum-and-double-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-310</link>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Resident</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 04:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=709#comment-310</guid>
		<description>Oh wow! Internet sales tax? Everyone is using an internet. That would likely make the state more prosperous.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh wow! Internet sales tax? Everyone is using an internet. That would likely make the state more prosperous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Subjunctive Mood versus Reality &#171; Affiliate Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/virginia-gains-momentum-and-double-threat/comment-page-1/#comment-307</link>
		<dc:creator>Subjunctive Mood versus Reality &#171; Affiliate Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 23:23:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=709#comment-307</guid>
		<description>[...] by an overwhelming vote of 14-1&#8243; and the bill SB 660 is now awaiting the full Senate vote [more about it here]. Today (02/11/2010) worrying news came from Illinois, Nevada [more here], and California [see [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] by an overwhelming vote of 14-1&#8243; and the bill SB 660 is now awaiting the full Senate vote [more about it here]. Today (02/11/2010) worrying news came from Illinois, Nevada [more here], and California [see [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
