<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: New Mexico Introduces Internet Tax Bill</title>
	<atom:link href="http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 09:39:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: ralph tyler</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-1590</link>
		<dc:creator>ralph tyler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jul 2010 19:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-1590</guid>
		<description>Instead of increasing tax revenue, perhaps New Mexico should trim its amazingly bloated bureaucracy and make it attractive for business to come to the state.

I am paying over 8% gross receipts tax in Santa Fe.  I am now ordering as much as possible tax free over the internet.

I am not going to subsidize moronic state government if I can help it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Instead of increasing tax revenue, perhaps New Mexico should trim its amazingly bloated bureaucracy and make it attractive for business to come to the state.</p>
<p>I am paying over 8% gross receipts tax in Santa Fe.  I am now ordering as much as possible tax free over the internet.</p>
<p>I am not going to subsidize moronic state government if I can help it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Clark</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-261</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 18:45:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-261</guid>
		<description>The recap of my day at the Roundhouse - the state capital building here in New Mexico - has been posted: http://www.danielmclark.com/affiliate-marketing/fighting-affiliate-tax.html - It&#039;s been tabled, and appears to be dead.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The recap of my day at the Roundhouse &#8211; the state capital building here in New Mexico &#8211; has been posted: <a href="http://www.danielmclark.com/affiliate-marketing/fighting-affiliate-tax.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.danielmclark.com/affiliate-marketing/fighting-affiliate-tax.html</a> &#8211; It&#8217;s been tabled, and appears to be dead.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: More States Introducing an Amazon/Affiliate Tax &#171; SpinSix Strategic Marketing Design : Blog</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-247</link>
		<dc:creator>More States Introducing an Amazon/Affiliate Tax &#171; SpinSix Strategic Marketing Design : Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 16:30:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-247</guid>
		<description>[...] more and more legislators are introducing bills that include an Amazon/Affiliate Tax. A bill in New Mexico, Idaho and Maine&#8230;and Florida, Tennessee and Wisconsin could soon follow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more and more legislators are introducing bills that include an Amazon/Affiliate Tax. A bill in New Mexico, Idaho and Maine&#8230;and Florida, Tennessee and Wisconsin could soon follow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 5 Star Affiliate Blogs</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-242</link>
		<dc:creator>5 Star Affiliate Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 17:22:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-242</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Important Affiliate Tax Issues in Colorado, Virginia, New Mexico, More...&lt;/strong&gt;

WARNING COLORADO affiliates &#8211; hearing this week! Other states that have proposed legislation too, see below. The PMA, Affiliate Advocacy and AbestWeb are doing a really great job of
......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Important Affiliate Tax Issues in Colorado, Virginia, New Mexico, More&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>WARNING COLORADO affiliates &#8211; hearing this week! Other states that have proposed legislation too, see below. The PMA, Affiliate Advocacy and AbestWeb are doing a really great job of<br />
&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel M. Clark</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-231</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel M. Clark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-231</guid>
		<description>Stan, I actually agree with you that online retailers should be collecting sales tax, but the way the states are going about implementing it is *wrong*. Also, while I agree that not collecting sales tax does give an online retailer a very minor advantage over a local business, the far greater advantage lies in the increased selection that a company like Amazon has. You can&#039;t stock nearly as much as it would take to compete with the selection they have. You have the advantage of immediacy though - I&#039;ve bought more items from local stores than from online sources because I wanted/needed them *now*. Amazon can&#039;t do that, and it far, far outweighs saving 18 cents in tax on my purchase.

Anyway, I&#039;ve read this bill, and I&#039;m currently looking for contact information for the House members that I need to contact about it. I&#039;ve also Twittered it and am trying to raise awareness with other internet folks I know around here. Thanks for bringing it to our attention, Mellie.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan, I actually agree with you that online retailers should be collecting sales tax, but the way the states are going about implementing it is *wrong*. Also, while I agree that not collecting sales tax does give an online retailer a very minor advantage over a local business, the far greater advantage lies in the increased selection that a company like Amazon has. You can&#8217;t stock nearly as much as it would take to compete with the selection they have. You have the advantage of immediacy though &#8211; I&#8217;ve bought more items from local stores than from online sources because I wanted/needed them *now*. Amazon can&#8217;t do that, and it far, far outweighs saving 18 cents in tax on my purchase.</p>
<p>Anyway, I&#8217;ve read this bill, and I&#8217;m currently looking for contact information for the House members that I need to contact about it. I&#8217;ve also Twittered it and am trying to raise awareness with other internet folks I know around here. Thanks for bringing it to our attention, Mellie.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jangro</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-228</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jangro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:50:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-228</guid>
		<description>Hi Mellie.  Note that the paragraph in section D doesn&#039;t end there, and that number that looks like reference to some law isn&#039;t actually part of the text.  Subsection D reads: 

&quot;D. The presumption of nexus established in Subsection C of this section may be rebutted by proof that the resident made no solicitation in the state that would satisfy the nexus requirements of the United States constitution on behalf of the person presumed to be engaging in business in New Mexico.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Mellie.  Note that the paragraph in section D doesn&#8217;t end there, and that number that looks like reference to some law isn&#8217;t actually part of the text.  Subsection D reads: </p>
<p>&#8220;D. The presumption of nexus established in Subsection C of this section may be rebutted by proof that the resident made no solicitation in the state that would satisfy the nexus requirements of the United States constitution on behalf of the person presumed to be engaging in business in New Mexico.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Mexico Affiliates, come on down! You&#8217;re the Next Contestant &#8230;</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-227</link>
		<dc:creator>New Mexico Affiliates, come on down! You&#8217;re the Next Contestant &#8230;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:45:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-227</guid>
		<description>[...] Scott Jangro on January 21, 2010   ShareAccording to Melanie Seery at Affiliate Advocacy, an Affiliate Tax copy-cat bill has been introduced in New [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Scott Jangro on January 21, 2010   ShareAccording to Melanie Seery at Affiliate Advocacy, an Affiliate Tax copy-cat bill has been introduced in New [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-226</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:34:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-226</guid>
		<description>Good, New Mexico should keep up with the times. It is not fair that online stores don&#039;t collect the sales tax. I struggle everyday to earn a living and stores in other states have unfair advantage over me. Amazon is the worst - they give free shipping and no tax?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good, New Mexico should keep up with the times. It is not fair that online stores don&#8217;t collect the sales tax. I struggle everyday to earn a living and stores in other states have unfair advantage over me. Amazon is the worst &#8211; they give free shipping and no tax?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Mexico HB 50 &#8211; New Internet Tax Bill &#124; Professional Affiliate Program Management &#124; GTO Management</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-225</link>
		<dc:creator>New Mexico HB 50 &#8211; New Internet Tax Bill &#124; Professional Affiliate Program Management &#124; GTO Management</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 21:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-225</guid>
		<description>[...] to Melanie Seery from Affiliate Advocacy for the heads [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Melanie Seery from Affiliate Advocacy for the heads [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: New Mexico Looks Towards Internet (Affiliate) Tax &#171; Affiliate Marketing Blog</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/new-mexico-introduces-internet-tax-bill/comment-page-1/#comment-224</link>
		<dc:creator>New Mexico Looks Towards Internet (Affiliate) Tax &#171; Affiliate Marketing Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:20:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=556#comment-224</guid>
		<description>[...] More in Melanie&#8217;s New Mexico Introduces Internet Tax Bill post. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] More in Melanie&#8217;s New Mexico Introduces Internet Tax Bill post. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
