<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Affiliate Program Shuts Down Over Internet Sales Tax</title>
	<atom:link href="http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/another-affiliate-program-shuts-down-over-internet-sales-tax/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/another-affiliate-program-shuts-down-over-internet-sales-tax/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 14:40:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Lewis</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/another-affiliate-program-shuts-down-over-internet-sales-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-355</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:23:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=810#comment-355</guid>
		<description>Stan, this is by no means tax evasion. Companies like Drs. Foster &amp; Smith does not have nexus in most states of the Union, including my home state of California. State legislators are trying to create nexus by twisting the definition of nexus to the point of being nonsensical. Worse, their attempts will only harm small businesses and not result in the collection of sales and use tax. 

What Drs. Foster &amp; Smith point out is that companies that accept the new definition and collect the sales and use tax and remit it to the states are then might find themselves rewarded with penalties for not filing state corporate income tax returns and paying that tax.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stan, this is by no means tax evasion. Companies like Drs. Foster &amp; Smith does not have nexus in most states of the Union, including my home state of California. State legislators are trying to create nexus by twisting the definition of nexus to the point of being nonsensical. Worse, their attempts will only harm small businesses and not result in the collection of sales and use tax. </p>
<p>What Drs. Foster &amp; Smith point out is that companies that accept the new definition and collect the sales and use tax and remit it to the states are then might find themselves rewarded with penalties for not filing state corporate income tax returns and paying that tax.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stan</title>
		<link>http://affiliateadvocacy.com/2010/another-affiliate-program-shuts-down-over-internet-sales-tax/comment-page-1/#comment-348</link>
		<dc:creator>Stan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://affiliateadvocacy.com/?p=810#comment-348</guid>
		<description>Does anyone really care with the way they treat affiliates?  This just proves tax evasion anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does anyone really care with the way they treat affiliates?  This just proves tax evasion anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
